International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

Performance Evaluation of a MANET based Secure and Energy Optimized Communication Protocol (E2S-AODV) for Underwater Disaster Response Network

Author NameAuthor Details

Karan Singh, Rajeev Gupta

Karan Singh[1]

Rajeev Gupta[2]

[1]Department of Computer Science and Applications, M.M. Institute of Computer Technology and Business Management, MMDU, Mullana, India

[2]Department of Computer Science and Engineering, M.M. Engineering College, MMDU, Mullana, India

Abstract

In recent years, the role of telecommunications in Under Water Mobile Ad-hoc Network (UWMANET) has emerged as a significant field during disaster prevention and rescue operations. Various disaster prevention and rescue supported applications are introduced in these years for flood, tsunamis, and underwater earthquakes. While communication in UWMANET, the existing communication system has some limitations like high energy utilization, tremendous packet loss rate, and delay. Sensor nodes can be deployed for data collection from the dense underwater environment. In UWMANET, security is another critical aspect of secure data transmission. In this paper, a new UWMANET based routing protocol, i.e., E2S-AODV (Energy Efficient Secure Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector) is designed and tested for Under Water Disaster Response Network (UWDRN) in a controlled environment. The optimum route for data transmission is selected by Pigeons Swarm Optimization (PiSO). PiSO reduces the hop count in the chosen shortest path. Hello, messages are broadcasted to inform their neighbors that the connection to the host is active. LDW technique is used to authenticate these hello messages. For security purposes, original event message encrypted with CST (Ciphertext Stealing Technique) and qu-Vanstone ECC based public-key cryptography. To utilize energy efficiently, E2S-AODV introduced two energy concepts drains rate finder and residual energy finder. Results that are compared with existing disaster-based protocols; are pro-motive and assure an improved quality of service (QoS) achievement in terms of many multipronged metrics like energy efficiency, reliability, security, scalability, delay, and Throughput, etc. E2S-AODV achieved a 2% improvement in PDR, 5% enhancement in Throughput, 8% reduction in end-to-end delay, and 11% reduction in energy utilization compared to its near existing competent.

Index Terms

Energy Efficiency

End-to-End Delay

E2S-AODV

MANET

PDR

QoS

Security

Throughput

UWDRN

UWMANET

Reference

  1. 1.
    K. Singh, and A. K. Yadav. A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Routing Protocols in MANET, International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 5(7), 2016.
  2. 2.
    K. Singh, and R. Gupta. Comparative Assessment and Performance Analysis of Numerous Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Routing Protocols, Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, Vol. 16, pp. 3906–3911, 2019.
  3. 3.
    K. Singh, and R. Gupta. SO-AODV: A Secure and Optimized Ad-Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing Protocol over AODV with Quality Metrics for Disaster Response Applications, To be Published in Journal of Information and Technology Reserch (JITR), 14(3), by IGI global publications , US, 2020.
  4. 4.
    K. Singh, and R. Gupta. E2S-AODV: An Energy Efficient Multipronged Reliable Strategy ensuring Secure and Scalable QoS over Disaster Response Applications, International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, Volume 9, No.4, July – August 2020.
  5. 5.
    A. K. Yadav, and A. Kush. E2-SCRP: An Energy Efficient Secure Cluster based Routing Protocol for 3D Underwater Acoustic MANET (UWMANET), International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, ISSN: 2278-3075, 8(11), 2019.
  6. 6.
    Shanen Yu, Shuai Liu, Peng Jiang, "A High-Efficiency Uneven Cluster Deployment based on Network Layered for Event Coverage in UWSNs", Sensors Basel, MDPI, Vol. 16, Issue.2, PP. 2016.
  7. 7.
    Seyed Mohammed Ghoreyshi, AlirezaShahrabi, TuleenBoutaleb, Mohsen Khalily, "Mobile Data Gathering with Hop-Constrained Clustering in Underwater Sensor Networks", IEEE Access, vol.7, pp. 21118-21132.
  8. 8.
    S. Cai, Y. Zhu, T. Wang, G. Xu, A. Liu and X. Liu, "Data Collection in Underwater Sensor Networks based on Mobile Edge Computing," in IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 65357-65367, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2918213.
  9. 9.
    Fang Zhu, Junfang Wei, "An Energy Efficient Routing Protocol Based on Layers and Unequal Clusters in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks". Journal of Sensors. 2018. 1-10.
  10. 10.
    Guilista Khan, Rakesh Kumar Dwivedi, "Autonomous Deployment and Adjustment of Nodes in UWSN to Achieve Blanket Coverage (ADAN-BC)", International Journal of Information Technology, PP. 1-10, 2018.
  11. 11.
    Zhongsi Wang, Bang Wang, "A Novel Node Sinking Algorithm for 3D Coverage and Connectivity in Underwater Sensor Networks", Ad Hoc Networks, Vol. 56, PP. 43-35, 2017.
  12. 12.
    Mohammed Reza Khosravi, HmaidHabibRostami, "Efficient Routing for Dense UWSNs with High-Speed Mobile Nodes using Spherical Divisions", The Journal of Supercomputing, Vol. 74, Issue 2, PP. 696-716, 2018.
  13. 13.
    Gomathi R.M, J Martin Leo Manickam, "Energy Efficient Shortest Path Routing Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Wireless Sensor Network", Wireless Personal Communications, Vol.98, Issue.4, PP. 1-14, 2017
  14. 14.
    R.M. Gomathi, J. Martin Leo Manickam, "Energy Efficient Static Node Selection in Underwater Acoustic Wireless Sensor Network", Wireless Personal Communications, pp. 1-19.
  15. 15.
    ChhaganLal, Roberto Petroccia, KonstantinosPelekanakis, Mauro Conti, Joao Alves, "Toward the Development of Secure Underwater Acoustic networks", IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, Vol.12, issue.4, PP. 1075-1087, 2017.
  16. 16.
    Yue Zhao, Bo Tian, Zhouguo Chen, Yiming Liu, Jianwei Ding, "An Energy-Efficient Key Agreement Mechanism for Underwater Sensor Networks", Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Vol. 450, PP.1-13, 2017.
  17. 17.
    Jing Yan, Xian Yang, XiaoyuanLuo, Calian Chen, "Energy Efficient Data Collection over AUV-assisted Underwater Acoustic Sensor Network", IEEE Systems Journal, PP. 1-12, 2018.
  18. 18.
    Bisen, Dhananjay & Sharma, Sanjeev. (2017). An enhanced performance through agent-based secure approach for mobile ad hoc networks. International Journal of Electronics. 105. 1-21. 10.1080/00207217.2017.1355019.
  19. 19.
    T. S. Vamsi, P. Kumar, and T. Sruthi. Performance Analysis of AODV Routing Protocol in MANET under Blackhole Attack, Journal of Engineering Research and Application, ISSN: 2248-9622, 9(5), pp. 58-63, 2019.
  20. 20.
    Sathiamoorthy, J., Ramakrishnan, B. A Reliable Data Transmission in EAACK MANETs Using Hybrid Three-Tier Competent Fuzzy Cluster Algorithm. Wireless Pers Commun 97, 5897–5916 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4817-8
  21. 21.
    Mohanakrishnan, U., Bhagavathiperumal, R. & Jayaraman, S. A Trusted Waterfall Framework Based Peer to Peer Protocol for Reliable and Energy Efficient Data Transmission in MANETs. Wireless Pers Commun 102, 95–124 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5829-8.
  22. 22.
    C. Perkins, E. B. Royer, and S. Das. Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing, Retrieved March 1, 2001.
  23. 23.
    Andel, Todd & Yasinsac, Alec. (2006). On the credibility of MANET simulations. Computer. 39. 48 - 54. 10.1109/MC.2006.242.
  24. 24.
    Arora, D., Millman, E. & Neville, S.W. Enabling richer statistical MANET simulations through cluster computing. Cluster Comput 16, 989–1003 (2013).
  25. 25.
    Ochola, Elisha & Eloff, Mm & Van der Poll, John. (2012). Mobile ad-hoc network security challenges under AODV routing protocol. 113-122.
  26. 26.
    Pandya, Morli. (2013). Review on security issues of AODV routing protocol for MANETs. IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering. 14. 127-134. 10.9790/0661-145127134.
  27. 27.
    Alghfari, Fawaz & Saeed, Khalid. (2016). Energy Consumption Analysis of AODV and ABHMAODV Routing Protocols in MANET.
  28. 28.
    Anjum, S.S., Noor, R.M. & Anisi, M.H. Review on MANET Based Communication for Search and Rescue Operations. Wireless Pers Commun 94, 31–52 (2017).
  29. 29.
    Sara, Getsy & Subu, Neelavathy & Sridharan, D.. (2010). Evaluation and Comparison of Emerging Energy Efficient Routing Protocols in MANET. ICTACT JOURNAL ON COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY. 1. 37-46. 10.21917/ijct.2010.0006.
  30. 30.
    M. Barati, K. Atefi, F. Khosravi and Yashar Azab Daftari, "Performance evaluation of energy consumption for AODV and DSR routing protocols in MANET," 2012 International Conference on Computer & Information Science (ICCIS), Kuala Lumpeu, 2012, pp. 636-642, doi: 10.1109/ICCISci.2012.6297107.
  31. 31.
    Mostafa Abd-El-Barr, Bambang Sarif, "Swarm intelligence versus direct cover algorithms in synthesis of Multi-Valued Logic functions", Applied Computing and Informatics Available online 10 March 2020.
  32. 32.
    N. Khanna and K. K. Naik, "Design and implementation of an energy efficient routing approach based on existing AODV protocol in Mobile Adhoc Networks for military," 2016 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Electrical Electronics & Sustainable Energy Systems (ICETEESES), Sultanpur, 2016, pp. 216-222, doi: 10.1109/ICETEESES.2016.7581388.
  33. 33.
    P. Paranavithana and A. Jayakody, "Compromising AODV for better performance: Improve energy efficiency in AODV," 2017 6th National Conference on Technology and Management (NCTM), Malabe, 2017, pp. 201-204, doi: 10.1109/NCTM.2017.7872854.
  34. 34.
    Patel, Maitri & Patel, Manish. (2018). Energy Efficient Routing Using Residual Energy and Stability in Mobile Ad-Hoc Network. 857-861. 10.1109/ICIRCA.2018.8597298.
  35. 35.
    Shivashankar, & Suresh, H.N. & Varaprasad, Golla & Jayanthi, Guruswamy. (2014). Designing Energy Routing Protocol With Power Consumption Optimization in MANET. Emerging Topics in Computing, IEEE Transactions on. 2. 192-197. 10.1109/TETC.2013.2287177.
  36. 36.
    Sharma, Manmohan & Rashid, Mamoon. (2020). Security Attacks In MANET -A Comprehensive Study.
  37. 37.
    Vu Khanh, Quy & Hung, Le. (2020). A Trade-off between Energy Efficiency and High-Performance in Routing for Mobile Ad hoc Networks. Journal of Communications. 10.12720/jcm.15.3.263-269.
  38. 38.
    Anjum, Shaik & Md. Noor, Rafidah & Anisi, Hossein. (2015). Review on MANET Based Communication for Search and Rescue Operations. Wireless Personal Communications. 10.1007/s11277-015-3155-y.
  39. 39.
    M. Zaki, Salim & Ngadi, Md & Razak, Shukor. (2009). A review of delay aware routing protocols in MANET. ISSR Journals, CS Letters. Vol. 1 (1). 1-12.
  40. 40.
    Z. Chen, W. Zhou, S. Wu and L. Cheng, "An Adaptive on-Demand Multipath Routing Protocol With QoS Support for High-Speed MANET," in IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 44760-44773, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2978582.
  41. 41.
    Gutiérrez, Daniel & Askalani, M. & Toral, S.L. & Barrero, Federico & Asimakopoulou, Eleana & Bessis, Nik. (2015). A Survey on Multihop Ad Hoc Networks for Disaster Response Scenarios. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks. 2015. 10.1155/2015/647037.
SCOPUS
SCImago Journal & Country Rank