International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

Secure and Energy-Efficient Location-Aware Protocols for Flying Ad-Hoc Networks (FANETs)

Author NameAuthor Details

Gaurav Jindal, Navdeep Kaur

Gaurav Jindal[1]

Navdeep Kaur[2]

[1]Department of Computer Applications, Post Graduate Government College, Sector-46, Chandigarh, India.

[2]Department of Computer Science, Sri Guru Granth Sahib World University, Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab, India.

Abstract

The growing reliance on wireless networks and the unique attributes of Flying Ad-hoc Networks (FANETs) have propelled their advancement in both academic and industrial domains. With the proliferation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), FANETs have become indispensable for diverse applications, including traffic monitoring, videography, and a wide range of military and civilian operations. This study introduces an innovative hybrid metaheuristic swarm intelligence approach integrated with a supervised learning framework utilizing a backpropagation neural network. The proposed method focuses on clustering-based, location-aware, and energy-efficient routing in FANETs. Results demonstrate significant improvements in network performance, including enhanced energy conservation, prolonged network lifetime, and reduced end-to-end delay. Furthermore, the approach achieves high throughput, emphasizing its potential as a robust solution for optimizing network efficiency and sustainability. Additionally, a comparative analysis with existing optimization-based methods highlights issues and significant improvements in metrics like energy consumption, packet delivery ratio, and resistance to attacks. The results reveal that the proposed protocols achieve better energy conservation and prolonged network lifetime without compromising security or quality of service. This research establishes a new paradigm for leveraging supervised learning to address critical challenges in FANETs while promoting energy efficiency and reliability.

Index Terms

FANETs

UAV

Wireless Networks Backpropagation

Neural Network

Supervised Learning

Clustering

Routing

Reference

  1. 1.
    H. Ali, S. ul Islam, H. Song, and K. Munir, “A performance-aware routing mechanism for flying ad hoc networks,” Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2021, doi: 10.1002/ett.4192.
  2. 2.
    J. Liu et al., “QMR:Q-learning based Multi-objective optimization Routing protocol for Flying Ad Hoc Networks,” Comput. Commun., vol. 150, pp. 304–316, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2019.11.011.
  3. 3.
    N. I. Mowla, N. H. Tran, I. Doh, and K. Chae, “AFRL: Adaptive federated reinforcement learning for intelligent jamming defence in FANET,” J. Commun. Networks, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 244–258, 2020, doi: 10.1109/JCN.2020.000015.
  4. 4.
    X. Li, F. Deng, and J. Yan, “Mobility-assisted adaptive routing for intermittently connected FANETs,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 715, pp1-6, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/715/1/012028.
  5. 5.
    Q. Sang, H. Wu, L. Xing, H. Ma, and P. Xie, “An Energy-Efficient Opportunistic Routing Protocol Based on Trajectory Prediction for FANETs,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 192009–192020, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3032956.
  6. 6.
    C. Pu, “Jamming-Resilient Multipath Routing Protocol for Flying Ad Hoc Networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, no. c, pp. 68472–68486, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2879758.
  7. 7.
    T. Ahn, J. Seok, I. Lee, and J. Han, “Reliable Flying IoT Networks for UAV Disaster Rescue Operations,” Mob. Inf. Syst., vol. 2018, no. ii,pp 1-12 2018, doi: 10.1155/2018/2572460.
  8. 8.
    R. Duan, J. Wang, C. Jiang, Y. Ren, and L. Hanzo, “The Transmit-Energy vs Computation-Delay Trade-Off in Gateway-Selection for Heterogenous Cloud Aided Multi-UAV Systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 3026–3039, 2019, doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2018.2889672.
  9. 9.
    J. Gu, T. Su, Q. Wang, X. Du, and M. Guizani, “Multiple Moving Targets Surveillance Based on a Cooperative Network for Multi-UAV,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 82–89, 2018, doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2018.1700422.
  10. 10.
    Z. Zheng, A. K. Sangaiah, and T. Wang, “Adaptive Communication Protocols in Flying Ad Hoc Network,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 136–142, 2018, doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2017.1700323.
  11. 11.
    F. Aftab, A. Khan, and Z. Zhang, “Hybrid Self-Organized Clustering Scheme for Drone Based Cognitive Internet of Things,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 56217–56227, 2019, doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2913912.
  12. 12.
    D. Liu et al., “A Coalition-Based Communication Framework for Task-Driven Flying Ad-Hoc Networks,” pp. 1–7, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.00896.
  13. 13.
    Namdev, Mayank, Sachin Goyal, and Ratish Agarwal. "An optimized communication scheme for energy efficient and secure flying ad-hoc network (FANET)." Wireless Personal Communications 120, pp 1291-1312 no. 2 (2021): 1291-1312.
  14. 14.
    M. Tropea, P. Fazio, F. De Rango, and N. Cordeschi, “A new FANET simulator for managing drone networks and providing dynamic connectivity,” Electron., vol. 9, pp 1-18, no. 4, 2020, doi: 10.3390/electronics9040543.
  15. 15.
    K. A. Darabkh, M. G. Alfawares, and S. Althunibat, “MDRMA: Multi-data rate mobility-aware AODV-based protocol for flying ad-hoc networks,” Veh. Commun., vol. 18, p. 100163, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.vehcom.2019.100163.
  16. 16.
    Y. He, X. Tang, R. Zhang, X. Du, D. Zhou, and M. Guizani, “A Course-Aware Opportunistic Routing Protocol for FANETs,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 144303–144312, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2944867.
  17. 17.
    J. Hong and D. Zhang, “TARCS: A topology change aware-based routing protocol choosing scheme of FANETs,” Electron., vol. 8, pp 1-13, no. 3, 2019, doi: 10.3390/electronics8030274.
  18. 18.
    A. Khan, F. Aftab, and Z. Zhang, “BICSF: Bio-Inspired Clustering Scheme for FANETs,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 31446–31456, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2902940.
  19. 19.
    I. Mahmud and Y. Z. Cho, “Adaptive Hello Interval in FANET Routing Protocols for Green UAVs,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 63004–63015, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2917075.
  20. 20.
    A. Khan, F. Aftab, and Z. Zhang, “Self-organization based clustering scheme for FANETs using Glowworm Swarm Optimization,” Phys. Commun., vol. 36, p. 100769, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.phycom.2019.100769.
  21. 21.
    M. A. Khan, I. M. Qureshi, and F. Khanzada, “A hybrid communication scheme for efficient and low-cost deployment of future flying AD-HOC network (Fanet),” Drones, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2019, doi: 10.3390/drones3010016.
  22. 22.
    J. Souza, J. Jailton, T. Carvalho, J. Araújo, R. Francês, and Z. Kaleem, “A Proposal for Routing Protocol for FANET: A Fuzzy System Approach with QoE/QoS Guarantee,” Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput., vol. 2019, pp. 1-14 doi: 10.1155/2019/8709249.
  23. 23.
    R. Valentino, W. S. Jung, and Y. B. Ko, “A design and simulation of the opportunistic computation offloading with learning-based prediction for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) clustering networks,” Sensors (Switzerland), vol. 18, no. 11, 2018, doi: 10.3390/s18113751.
  24. 24.
    T. Lagkas, V. Argyriou, S. Bibi, and P. Sarigiannidis, “UAV IoT framework views and challenges: Towards protecting drones as ‘things,’” Sensors (Switzerland), vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1–21, 2018, doi: 10.3390/s18114015.
  25. 25.
    K. Singh and A. K. Verma, “A fuzzy-based trust model for flying ad hoc networks (FANETs),” Int. J. Commun. Syst., vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1–19, 2018, doi: 10.1002/dac.3517.