International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

Impact of Network Complexity, Mobility Models, and Wireless Technologies on SDN-DTN Performance in Internet of Vehicles (IoV) Environments

Author NameAuthor Details

Olivia Nakayima, Mostafa I. Soliman, Kazunori Ueda, Samir A. Elsagheer

Olivia Nakayima[1]

Mostafa I. Soliman[2]

Kazunori Ueda[3]

Samir A. Elsagheer[4]

[1]Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Egypt–Japan University of Science and Technology, New Borg El-Arab City, Egypt.

[2]Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Egypt–Japan University of Science and Technology, New Borg El-Arab City, Egypt.

[3]Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.

[4]Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Egypt–Japan University of Science and Technology, New Borg El-Arab City, Egypt.

Abstract

The Internet of Vehicles (IoV) is a rapidly advancing field that necessitates highly efficient data transmission, particularly for services like video streaming, which require seamless delivery of audio and video content. However, the dynamic nature and high mobility inherent in IoV present significant challenges, impacting key metrics such as initial start time, stall count, and stall length. Existing research has addressed some optimization factors, yet comprehensive solutions that consider network complexities, node mobility patterns, and varying wireless technologies are still needed. This study proposes a model combining Software-Defined Networking (SDN) and Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) concepts to address these challenges. By exploring the impact of network complexities, node mobility patterns, and wireless technologies (including 802.11g and 802.11ax) on video streaming performance in both intra and inter-IoV networks, the study identifies critical factors contributing to optimal performance. The proposed SDN-DTN based model dynamically adapts to changing network conditions, thereby minimizing initial start times, reducing stall counts, and shortening stall lengths compared to existing methods. This approach offers valuable insights into designing robust and adaptive IoV infrastructure, emphasizing the importance of addressing complex network dynamics for seamless video streaming. The findings highlight the necessity of integrating advanced networking technologies to overcome the inherent challenges of IoV, ensuring a more resilient and efficient data transmission framework.

Index Terms

Delay-Tolerant Networking

Internet of Vehicles

Metrics

Performance Analysis

Simulator

Software-Defined Networking

Video Streaming

Wireless Technologies

Reference

  1. 1.
    K. N. Qureshi, S. Din, G. Jeon, and F. Piccialli, “Internet of vehicles: Key technologies, network model, solutions and challenges with future aspects,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1777–1786, 2020.
  2. 2.
    J. Guo, M. Bilal, Y. Qiu, C. Qian, X. Xu, and K.-K. R. Choo, “Survey on digital twins for Internet of Vehicles: Fundamentals, challenges, and opportunities,” Digit. Commun. Networks, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 237–247, 2024.
  3. 3.
    S. A. Elsagheer Mohamed, K. A. Alshalfan, M. A. Al-Hagery, and M. T. Ben Othman, “Safe Driving Distance and Speed for Collision Avoidance in Connected Vehicles,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 18, 2022, doi: 10.3390/s22187051.
  4. 4.
    M. Tian, C. Sun, and S. Wu, “An EMD and ARMA-based network traffic prediction approach in SDN-based internet of vehicles,” Wirel. Networks, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11276-021-02675-2.
  5. 5.
    I. Zacarias, L. P. Gaspary, A. Kohl, R. Q. A. Fernandes, J. M. Stocchero, and E. P. de Freitas, “Combining Software-Defined and Delay-Tolerant Approaches in Last-Mile Tactical Edge Networking,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 22–29, 2017, doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2017.1700239.
  6. 6.
    M. Moetesum, F. Hadi, M. Imran, A. A. Minhas, and A. V Vasilakos, “An adaptive and efficient buffer management scheme for resource-constrained delay tolerant networks,” Wirel. Networks, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 2189–2201, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11276-015-1085-y.
  7. 7.
    S. Ranjan Das, K. Sinha, N. Mukherjee, and B. P. Sinha, “Delay and Disruption Tolerant Networks: A Brief Survey BT - Intelligent and Cloud Computing,” 2021, pp. 297–305.
  8. 8.
    A. Hodaei and S. Babaie, “A Survey on Traffic Management in Software-Defined Networks: Challenges, Effective Approaches, and Potential Measures,” Wirel. Pers. Commun., vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 1507–1534, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11277-021-08100-3.
  9. 9.
    K. Ito, G. Hirakawa, G. Sato, and Y. Shibata, “SDN Based Road Condition Monitoring System for ITS,” Proc. - 2015 10th Int. Conf. Broadband Wirel. Comput. Commun. Appl. BWCCA 2015, pp. 163–168, 2015, doi: 10.1109/BWCCA.2015.110.
  10. 10.
    Z. Guo et al., “Improving the performance of load balancing in software-defined networks through load variance-based synchronization,” Comput. Networks, vol. 68, pp. 95–109, 2014.
  11. 11.
    S. Ahmad and A. H. Mir, “Scalability, Consistency, Reliability and Security in SDN Controllers: A Survey of Diverse SDN Controllers,” J. Netw. Syst. Manag., vol. 29, no. 1, p. 9, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10922-020-09575-4.
  12. 12.
    O. Nakayima, M. I. Soliman, K. Ueda, and S. A. E. Mohamed, “Combining Software-Defined and Delay-Tolerant Networking Concepts With Deep Reinforcement Learning Technology to Enhance Vehicular Networks,” IEEE Open J. Veh. Technol., vol. 5, pp. 721–736, 2024, doi: 10.1109/OJVT.2024.3396637.
  13. 13.
    M. A. Hoque, M. Razu, T. Islam, and A. Amin, “SDN-DTN Combined Architecture in Post Disaster Scenario — A new way to start,” in 2020 6th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), 2020, pp. 230–235. doi: 10.1109/ICACCS48705.2020.9074388.
  14. 14.
    F. Ajaz and M. Naseem, “Simulation of Routing Protocols for IoV in Real-Time Mobility Model Environment,” SN Comput. Sci., vol. 5, no. 3, p. 305, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s42979-024-02626-6.
  15. 15.
    Q. Cui et al., “Vehicular mobility patterns and their applications to Internet-of-Vehicles: a comprehensive survey,” Sci. China Inf. Sci., vol. 65, no. 11, p. 211301, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11432-021-3487-x.
  16. 16.
    N. Fan, Z. Duan, C. Q. Wu, G. Zhu, J. Yang, and Y. Zhu, “An adaptive and secure traffic information forwarding mechanism in Internet of Vehicles,” Int. J. Commun. Syst., vol. 33, no. 18, p. e4612, 2020.
  17. 17.
    A. Erfanian, F. Tashtarian, C. Timmerer, and H. Hellwagner, “QoCoVi: QoE- and cost-aware adaptive video streaming for the Internet of Vehicles,” Comput. Commun., vol. 190, pp. 1–9, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2022.03.003.
  18. 18.
    R. Lent, “Adaptive DTN Routing: A Neuromorphic Networking Perspective,” IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 871–880, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TCCN.2020.3043791.
  19. 19.
    Z. Luo and M. Liwang, “Intelligent caching for mobile video streaming in vehicular networks with deep reinforcement learning,” Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 23, p. 11942, 2022.
  20. 20.
    A. Balasubramanian, B. Levine, and A. Venkataramani, “DTN routing as a resource allocation problem,” ACM SIGCOMM 2007 Conf. Comput. Commun., pp. 373–384, 2007, doi: 10.1145/1282380.1282422.
  21. 21.
    M. Y. Darmani and S. Karimi, “Message Overhead Control Using P-Epidemic Routing Method in Resource-Constrained Heterogeneous DTN,” in 2021 29th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE), 2021, pp. 498–502. doi: 10.1109/ICEE52715.2021.9544149.
  22. 22.
    B. S. Kumar, S. Vishnubhatla, M. B. Chevuru, and S. P. Shetty, “Performance Analysis of Prophet Routing Protocol in Delay Tolerant Network by using Machine Learning Models,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 14, no. 5, 2023.
  23. 23.
    E. Spaho, “Usage of DTNs for low-cost IoT application in smart cities: performance evaluation of spray and wait routing protocol and its enhanced versions,” Int. J. Grid Util. Comput., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 173–177, 2021.
  24. 24.
    S. Ullah and A. Qayyum, “Socially-aware adaptive delay tolerant network (dtn) routing protocol,” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 1, p. e0262565, 2022.
  25. 25.
    K. Ahmad, M. Fathima, M. S. Hossen, J. Ahamed, and K. A. Bin Ahmad, “Opportunistic Networks: An Empirical Research of Routing Protocols and Mobility Models,” SN Comput. Sci., vol. 4, no. 5, p. 652, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s42979-023-02054-y.
  26. 26.
    H. Kaur and H. Kaur, “An Enhanced Spray-Copy-Wait DTN Routing Using Optimized Delivery Predictability BT - Computer Communication, Networking and Internet Security,” 2017, pp. 603–610.
  27. 27.
    O. Nakayima, M. I. Soliman, K. Ueda, and S. A. Elsagheer, “Enhancing Bundle Delivery Efficiency in Mobile Ad-hoc Networks with a Multi-protocol Delay-Tolerant Network,” in Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers, 2024, pp. 306–309.
  28. 28.
    W. Kibirango, “The Development of Delay-Tolerant Routing Protocols for Android-based Devices.” 2019.
  29. 29.
    M. W. Kang, D. Y. Seo, and Y. W. Chung, “An efficient delay tolerant networks routing protocol for information-centric networking,” Electronics, vol. 9, no. 5, p. 839, 2020.
  30. 30.
    A. P. Silva, K. Obraczka, S. Burleigh, and C. M. Hirata, “Smart congestion control for delay-and disruption tolerant networks,” in 2016 13th Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON), 2016, pp. 1–9.
  31. 31.
    G. Zhao, M. Yang, Q. Guo, and G. Wang, “An improved earliest-delivery routing algorithm in double-layered satellite delay tolerant networks,” in 2018 International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications (ISNCC), 2018, pp. 1–6.
  32. 32.
    M. Huang, C. Li, L. Yan, S. Cao, and L. Zhang, “An Improved Probabilistic Routing Algorithm Based on Moving Direction Prediction in DTNs,” in Proceedings of the World Conference on Intelligent and 3-D Technologies (WCI3DT 2022) Methods, Algorithms and Applications, 2023, pp. 111–131.
  33. 33.
    M. T. Abbas, A. Muhammad, and W.-C. Song, “SD-IoV: SDN enabled routing for internet of vehicles in road-aware approach,” J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1265–1280, 2020.
  34. 34.
    K. Smida, H. Tounsi, M. Frikha, and Y.-Q. Song, “FENS: Fog-enabled network slicing in SDN/NFV-based IoV,” Wirel. Pers. Commun., vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 2175–2202, 2023.
  35. 35.
    L. Lin and P. Lin, “Software-Defined Networking (SDN) for Cloud Applications BT - Cloud Computing: Challenges, Limitations and R&D Solutions,” Z. Mahmood, Ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014, pp. 209–233. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-10530-7_9.
  36. 36.
    D. Zeng, L. Gu, S. Pan, and S. Guo, “Software Defined Networking I: SDN BT - Software Defined Systems: Sensing, Communication and Computation,” D. Zeng, L. Gu, S. Pan, and S. Guo, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 57–76. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-32942-6_4.
  37. 37.
    D. Ta, S. Booth, and R. Dudukovich, “Towards software-defined delay tolerant networks,” Network, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 15–38, 2022.
  38. 38.
    J. Contreras-Castillo, S. Zeadally, and J. A. Guerrero-Ibanez, “Internet of Vehicles: Architecture, Protocols, and Security,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 3701–3709, 2018, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2017.2690902.
  39. 39.
    “olivia-nakayima / dt-sd-net — Bitbucket.” https://bitbucket.org/olivia-nakayima/dt-sd-net/src/master/ (accessed Aug. 05, 2024).
  40. 40.
    A. Shah and A. Jalil, “Investigation and Performance Evaluation of different Bluetooth voice packets against ambient error conditions,” in 2006 IEEE International Multitopic Conference, 2006, pp. 11–16. doi: 10.1109/INMIC.2006.358127.
SCOPUS
SCImago Journal & Country Rank