International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

Machine Learning Based Misbehavior Detection System for False Data Injection Attack in Internet of Vehicles Using Neighbor Public Transport Vehicle Approach

Author NameAuthor Details

Hussaini Aliyu Idris, Kazunori Ueda, Bassem Mokhtar, Samir A. Elsagheer Mohamed

Hussaini Aliyu Idris[1]

Kazunori Ueda[2]

Bassem Mokhtar[3]

Samir A. Elsagheer Mohamed[4]

[1]Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (E-JUST), New Borg-El-Arab City, Alexandria , Egypt.

[2]Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Waseda University Tokyo, Japan.

[3]College of Information Technology, UAE University, Al Ain, UAE.

[4]Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (E-JUST), New Borg-El-Arab City, Alexandria , Egypt.

Abstract

The integration of the Internet of Vehicles (IoV) into the Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) has significantly improved its operations, leading to a reduction in road traffic accidents, efficient traffic control, and a decrease in carbon emissions for a more sustainable environment aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, the adoption of IoV networks introduces privacy and security challenges. Although cryptographic techniques such as public-key infrastructure (PKI) proposed by standardization bodies like IEEE and ETSI provide protection against outsider attackers, they fail to address the threat posed by insider attackers. To overcome this limitation, researchers have proposed data-centric machine learning-based misbehavior detection frameworks that focus on identifying and mitigating insider attacks. However, existing approaches primarily rely on the Basic Safety Message (BSM) data received from a single vehicle, which allows attackers to manipulate the BSM data without being detected. In this paper, we present a novel data-centric misbehavior detection framework specifically designed to detect false data injection attacks in IoV networks. Our approach leverages neighboring public transportation vehicles (NPTVs) to enhance the detection capabilities. By incorporating the BSM data from NPTVs, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed framework in different scenarios using deep learning, decision tree, and random forest algorithms. Through extensive evaluation, we achieved precision, recall, F1-Score, and accuracy rates of up to 99%, showcasing the superior performance of our approach.

Index Terms

Machine Learning

Internet of Vehicles

Misbehavior Detection System

Intrusion Detection

Intelligent Transportation System

Basic Safety Message

Reference

  1. 1.
    L. Ecola, S. W. Popper, R. Silberglitt, and L. Fraade-Blanar, “Road to Zero: Developing A Vision for a Future with Zero Roadway Fatalities,” 2019.
  2. 2.
    S. A. Elsagheer Mohamed and K. A. AlShalfan, “Intelligent Traffic Management System Based on the Internet of Vehicles (IoV),” J. Adv. Transp., vol. 2021, p. 4037533, 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/4037533.
  3. 3.
    S. A. Elsagheer Mohamed et al., “Safe Driving Distance and Speed for Collision Avoidance in Connected Vehicles,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 18, 2022, doi: 10.3390/s22187051.
  4. 4.
    S. Chen et al., “Vehicle-to-Everything (v2x) Services Supported by LTE-Based Systems and 5G,” IEEE Commun. Stand. Mag., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 70–76, 2017, doi: 10.1109/MCOMSTD.2017.1700015.
  5. 5.
    I. S. Committee and others, “IEEE standard for wireless access in vehicular environments (WAVE)-networking services,” IEEE Std, vol. 1609, pp. 3–2010, 2007.
  6. 6.
    J. Kamel, M. R. Ansari, J. Petit, A. Kaiser, I. Ben Jemaa, and P. Urien, “Simulation Framework for Misbehavior Detection in Vehicular Networks,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 6631–6643, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1109/TVT.2020.2984878.
  7. 7.
    B. Brecht and T. Hehn, “A Security Credential Management System for V2X Communications,” in Connected Vehicles: Intelligent Transportation Systems, R. Miucic, Ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 83–115. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-94785-3_4.
  8. 8.
    A. Boualouache and T. Engel, “A Survey on Machine Learning-based Misbehavior Detection Systems for 5G and Beyond Vehicular Networks,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, p. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1109/COMST.2023.3236448.
  9. 9.
    T. Garg et al., A Survey on Machine Learning-based Misbehavior Detection Systems for 5G and Beyond Vehicular Networks, vol. 3, no. 5. 2022, pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1109/OJVT.2021.3138354.
  10. 10.
    S. A. E. Mohamed, “Automatic traffic violation recording and reporting system to limit traffic accidents: based on vehicular Ad-hoc networks (VANET),” in 2019 International Conference on Innovative Trends in Computer Engineering (ITCE), 2019, pp. 254–259.
  11. 11.
    S. A. Elsagheer, Y. Atallah, and H. Hashem, “Enhancing Road Safety Using the Internet of Vehicles: A Machine Learning-Based Collision Detection Approach,” in 2023 11th International Japan-Africa Conference on Electronics, Communications, and Computations (JAC-ECC), 2023, pp. 68–72.
  12. 12.
    S. Sharma and B. Kaushik, “A survey on internet of vehicles: Applications, security issues & solutions,” Veh. Commun., vol. 20, p. 100182, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vehcom.2019.100182.
  13. 13.
    A. Sharma and A. Jaekel, “Machine Learning Based Misbehaviour Detection in VANET Using Consecutive BSM Approach,” IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology, vol. 3. pp. 1–14, 2022. doi: 10.1109/OJVT.2021.3138354.
  14. 14.
    J. Kamel, M. Wolf, R. W. Van Der Hei, A. Kaiser, P. Urien, and F. Kargl, VeReMi Extension: A Dataset for Comparable Evaluation of Misbehavior Detection in VANETs, vol. 2020-June. 2020, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICC40277.2020.9149132.
  15. 15.
    A. Sharma and A. Jaekel, “Machine Learning Approach for Detecting Location Spoofing in VANET,” in 2021 International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN), 2021, vol. 2021-July, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICCCN52240.2021.9522170.
  16. 16.
    P. Sharma and H. Liu, “A Machine-Learning-Based Data-Centric Misbehavior Detection Model for Internet of Vehicles,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 4991–4999, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2020.3035035.
  17. 17.
    S. So, P. Sharma, and J. Petit, “Integrating Plausibility Checks and Machine Learning for Misbehavior Detection in VANET,” in 2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), 2018, pp. 564–571. doi: 10.1109/ICMLA.2018.00091.
  18. 18.
    P. K. Singh, S. Gupta, R. Vashistha, S. K. Nandi, and S. Nandi, “Machine learning based approach to detect position falsification attack in vanets,” in Security and Privacy: Second ISEA International Conference, ISEA-ISAP 2018, Jaipur, India, January, 9--11, 2019, Revised Selected Papers 2, 2019, pp. 166–178.
  19. 19.
    H. Grover, T. Alladi, V. Chamola, D. Singh, and K.-K. R. Choo, “Edge Computing and Deep Learning Enabled Secure Multitier Network for Internet of Vehicles,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 8, no. 19, pp. 14787–14796, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3071362.
  20. 20.
    G. O. Anyanwu, C. I. Nwakanma, J. M. Lee, and D.-S. Kim, “Novel hyper-tuned ensemble Random Forest algorithm for the detection of false basic safety messages in Internet of Vehicles,” ICT Express, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2022.06.003.
  21. 21.
    G. O. Anyanwu, C. I. Nwakanma, J.-M. Lee, and D.-S. Kim, “Falsification Detection System for IoV Using Randomized Search Optimization Ensemble Algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., pp. 1–15, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2022.3233536.
  22. 22.
    S. A. Almalki and F. T. Sheldon, “Deep Learning to Improve False Data Injection Attack Detection in Cooperative Intelligent Transportation Systems,” in 2021 IEEE 12th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON), 2021, pp. 1016–1021. doi: 10.1109/IEMCON53756.2021.9623153.
  23. 23.
    Y. Wu, L. Wu, and H. Cai, “A deep learning approach to secure vehicle to road side unit communications in intelligent transportation system,” Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 105, p. 108542, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108542.
  24. 24.
    T. Alladi, B. Gera, A. Agrawal, V. Chamola, and F. R. Yu, “DeepADV: A Deep Neural Network Framework for Anomaly Detection in VANETs,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 12013–12023, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TVT.2021.3113807.
  25. 25.
    H. A. Idris, K. Ueda, B. Mokhtar, and S. A. E. Mohamed, “Novel Intelligent BSM Falsification Attack Detection System Using Trusted Neighbor Vehicle Approach in IoV,” Int. J. Comput., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 116–125, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.47839/ijc.23.1.3443.
  26. 26.
    T. Alladi, V. Kohli, V. Chamola, and F. R. Yu, “A deep learning based misbehavior classification scheme for intrusion detection in cooperative intelligent transportation systems,” Digit. Commun. Networks, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcan.2022.06.018.
  27. 27.
    F. Hawlader, A. Boualouache, S. Faye, and T. Engel, “Intelligent Misbehavior Detection System for Detecting False Position Attacks in Vehicular Networks,” in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), Jun. 2021, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICCWorkshops50388.2021.9473606.
  28. 28.
    X. Wang, Y. Zhu, S. Han, L. Yang, H. Gu, and F.-Y. Wang, “Fast and Progressive Misbehavior Detection in Internet of Vehicles Based on Broad Learning and Incremental Learning Systems,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 4788–4798, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3109276.
  29. 29.
    G. O. Anyanwu, C. I. Nwakanma, J.-H. Kim, J.-M. Lee, and D.-S. Kim, “Misbehavior Detection in Connected Vehicles using BurST-ADMA Dataset,” in 2022 13th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), Oct. 2022, pp. 874–878. doi: 10.1109/ICTC55196.2022.9952947.
  30. 30.
    T. Alladi, V. Kohli, V. Chamola, and F. R. Yu, “Securing the internet of vehicles: A deep learning-based classification framework,” IEEE Netw. Lett., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 94–97, 2021.
  31. 31.
    Y. L. Morgan, “Notes on DSRC \& WAVE standards suite: Its architecture, design, and characteristics,” IEEE Commun. Surv. \& Tutorials, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 504–518, 2010.
  32. 32.
    M. A. Amanullah, M. Baruwal Chhetri, S. W. Loke, and R. Doss, “BurST-ADMA: Towards an Australian Dataset for Misbehaviour Detection in the Internet of Vehicles,” 2022, pp. 624–629. doi: 10.1109/PerComWorkshops53856.2022.9767505.
  33. 33.
    C. Sommer et al., “Veins: The open source vehicular network simulation framework,” in EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing, A. Virdis and M. Kirsche, Eds. Springer, 2019, pp. 215–252. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-12842-5_6.
  34. 34.
    C. C. Robusto, “The cosine-haversine formula,” Am. Math. Mon., vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 38–40, 1957.
SCOPUS
SCImago Journal & Country Rank