International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

MENU
International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

TCP Performance Enhancement in IoT and MANET: A Systematic Literature Review

Author NameAuthor Details

Sultana Parween, Syed Zeeshan Hussain

Sultana Parween[1]

Syed Zeeshan Hussain[2]

[1]Department of Computer Science, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India.

[2]Department of Computer Science, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India.

Cite this Article

DOI: 10.22247/ijcna/2023/223313

Pages : 543-568

 Download PDF

1363

Views

Abstract

TCP operates as a unicast protocol that prioritizes the reliability of established connections. This protocol allows for the explicit and acknowledged establishment and dissolution of connections, the transmission of data without loss of context or duplication, the management of traffic flows, the avoidance of congestion, and the asynchronous signaling of time-sensitive information. In this research, we use the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) technique to examine and better understand the several methods recently given for enhancing TCP performance in IoT and MANET networks. This work aims to assess and classify the current research strategies on TCP performance approaches published between 2016 and 2023 using both analytical and statistical methods. Technical parameters suggested case study and evaluation settings are compared between MANET and IoT to give a taxonomy for TCP performance improvement options based on the content of current studies chosen using the SLR procedure. Each study's merits and limitations are outlined, along with suggestions for improving those studies and areas where further research is needed. This work outlines the basic issues of TCP when it is used in IoT and MANET. It also highlights the recent approaches for TCP performance enhancement, such as machine Learning-based approaches, multi-path TCP, congestion control, buffer management, and route optimization. It also provides the potential for future research directions into the effectiveness of TCP performance in IoT and MANET. The major findings of this review are to provide a thorough understanding of the latest techniques for enhancing TCP performance in the IoT and MANET networks, which can be beneficial for researchers and practitioners in the field of networking.

Index Terms

Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)

Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET)

Internet of Things (IoT)

Retransmission Timeout (RTO)

RTT (Round Trip Time)

Congestion Control (CC)

Acknowledgement (ACK).

Reference

  1. 1.
    Postel J., “Transmission control protocol,” IETF, RFC 793, Sep. 1981. Available online: http://www. ietforg/rfc/rfc0793.txt.
  2. 2.
    V. Jacobson, “Congestion avoidance and control,” ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., vol. 18(4):14–3, 1988.
  3. 3.
    V. Jacobson. “Berkeley TCP evolution from 4.3-tahoe to 4.3-reno.” In Proceedings of the Eighteenth Internet Engineering Task Force, Vancouver, British Columbia, August 1990.
  4. 4.
    M. Allman, V. Paxson, and W. R. Stevens, “TCP Congestion Control,” RFC 2581, 1999. Available online: www.icir.org/mallman/papers/rfc2581.txt
  5. 5.
    Vaidya, Nitin H., et al. "Delayed duplicate acknowledgements: a TCP?Unaware approach to improve performance of TCP over wireless." Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 2.1 (2002): 59-70.
  6. 6.
    Ansari M, Ali SA, Alam M. Internet of things (IoT) fusion with cloud computing: current research and future direction. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2022; 9(97):1812-45.
  7. 7.
    S. Parween, S. Z. Hussain, and M. A. Hussain, “A Survey on Issues and Possible Solutions of Cross-Layer Design in Internet of Things,” Int. J. Computer. Netw Applications., vol. 8, no. 4, p. 311, 2021.
  8. 8.
    S. Parween and S. Z. Hussain, “A review on cross-layer design approach in WSN by different techniques,” Adv. Sci. Tech. Eng. Syst., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 741–754, 2020.
  9. 9.
    M. Abu-Zant and M. Hamarsheh, “A Comparison of Congestion Control Variants of TCP in Reactive Routing Protocols MANET,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 25–33, 2017.
  10. 10.
    X. Zhu, R. Zheng, D. Yang, H. Liu, and J. Hou, “Radio-aware TCP optimization in mobile network,” IEEE Wirel. Commun. Netw. Conf. WCNC, no. March 2017.
  11. 11.
    K. Liu and J. Y. B. Lee, “On Improving TCP Performance over Mobile Data Networks,” IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput., vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 2522–2536, 2016.
  12. 12.
    Bhatia, Gaurav, and Vivek Kumar. "CTCP: a cross-layer information based TCP for MANET." International Journal of Ad Hoc, Sensor & Ubiquitous Computing 5.1 (2014): 1.
  13. 13.
    E. Larsen, TCP in MANETs – challenges and Solutions, no. September. 2012.
  14. 14.
    S. K. Pradhan, N. Islam, S. K. Debnath, and F. Ahmed, “Performance Evaluation of TCP over Mobile Ad-hoc Networks,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Secur., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2010.
  15. 15.
    S. Papanastasiou, M. Ould-khaoua, and L. M. Mackenzie, “On the evaluation of TCP in MANETs,” Computing.
  16. 16.
    Md Irfan Ahmed & Ramesh Kumar (2023) A systematic review on optimal placement of CHP, Smart Science, 11:1, 171-191.
  17. 17.
    W. A. Almobaideen and N. O. Al-maitah, “TCP Karak: A New TCP AIMD Algorithm Based on Duplicated Acknowledgements for MANET,” Int. J. Commun. Netw. Syst. Sci., vol. 07, no. 09, pp. 396–407, 2014.
  18. 18.
    S. Thuneibat, “Simulation and Qos Analysis of Tcp, Udp/Aodv,” J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 570–577, 2022.
  19. 19.
    M. A. Taha, “Performance comparison of transport layer protocols for multimedia application in MANET networks,” J. Eng. Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 14, pp. 5843–5847, 2018.
  20. 20.
    N. Malik, P. R. Ragiri, and R. Chaudhary, “Analysis of TCP traffic under Blackhole Attack in MANETs,” Int. J. Futur. Gener. Commun. Netw., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 49–58, 2017.
  21. 21.
    S. K. B. and S. T. Namita Das, “Performance Analysis of TCP Variants Using Routing Protocols of MANET in Grid Topology,” Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput., vol. 768, 2019.
  22. 22.
    M. H. Hanin, M. Amani, and Y. Fakhri, “Improved TCP Prediction Congestion in Mobile Ad Hoc Network Based on Cross-Layer and Fuzzy Logic,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 15, no. 14, pp. 125–139, 2021.
  23. 23.
    N. I. Sarkar, P. H. Ho, S. Gul, and S. M. S. Zabir, “TCP-LoRaD: A Loss Recovery and Differentiation Algorithm for Improving TCP Performance over MANETs in Noisy Channels,” Electron., vol. 11, no. 9, 2022.
  24. 24.
    P. Sivakumar and A. MahabubBasha, “Convex optimized lagrange multiplier based algebraic congestion likelihood for improved TCP performance in MANET,” J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 908–918, 2018.
  25. 25.
    G. N. Vivekananda and P. C. Reddy, “Performance evaluation of TCP, UDP, and SCTP in manets,” ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 3087–3092, 2018.
  26. 26.
    M. H. Hanin, M. Amnai, and Y. Fakhri, “New adaptation method based on cross layer and TCP over protocols to improve QoS in mobile ad hoc network,” Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 2134–2142, 2021.
  27. 27.
    P. S. S. Kumar and A. R. Babu, “Cross-layer based congestion detection and dynamic proxy acknowledgment scheme for TCP in MANET,” Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 158–165, 2018.
  28. 28.
    N. Nigar and M. Anwarul Azim, “Fairness comparison of TCP variants over proactive and reactive routing protocol in MANET,” Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2199–2206, 2018.
  29. 29.
    N. Sharma and G. Patidar, “Improved congestion control mechanism using modified hybrid-TCP in mobile ad-hoc neworks,” Proc. - 2016 2nd Int. Conf. Comput. Intell. Commu. Tech. CICT 2016, pp.312–315, 2016.
  30. 30.
    K. Patel and J. M. Rathod, “Effective utilization of bandwidth for mobile ad hoc network,” Indian J. Sci. Technol., vol. 9, no. 27, 2016.
  31. 31.
    M. Z. Oo, M. Othman, and T. O’Farrell, “A proxy acknowledgement mechanism for TCP variants in mobile ad hoc networks,” J. Commun. Networks, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 238–245, 2016.
  32. 32.
    K. P. Kumar Rao and T. S. Murugan, “A Proposal for Improving Performance of TCP in MANET’s Employing SADCA (Smart Acknowledgement Distributed Channel Access) Scheme,” Indian J. Sci. Technol., vol. 10, no. 13, pp. 1–8, 2017.
  33. 33.
    R. Pusuluri, “A Study on Improving the Performance of TCP and Various Design Issues in Manets,” Indian J. Sci. Tech., vol. 9, no.1, pp. 1–7, 2016.
  34. 34.
    A. S. Volkov, A. A. Bakhtin, A. V. Ugrovatov, E. A. Volkova, and D. V. Shalyagin, “Applying of TCP-based Protocols for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks with PN Signals in NS-3,” 2018 Syst. Signal Synchronization, Gener. Process. Telecommun. SYNCHROINFO 2018, pp. 1–6, 2018.
  35. 35.
    D. Sunitha, A. Nagaraju, and G. Narsimha, “Dynamic TCP-Vegas based on cuckoo search for efficient congestion control for MANET,” Int. J. Signal Imaging Syst. Eng., vol. 10, no. 1/2, p. 47, 2017.
  36. 36.
    J. Govindarajan, N. Vibhurani, and G. Kousalya, “Enhanced TCP NCE: A modified non-congestion events detection, differentiation and reaction to improve the end-to-end performance over MANET,” Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput., vol. 519, pp. 443–454, 2018.
  37. 37.
    T. Zhang, S. Zhao, and B. Cheng, “Multipath Routing and MPTCP-Based Data Delivery over Manets,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 32652–32673, 2020.
  38. 38.
    V. K. Sharma, L. P. Verma, and M. Kumar, “CL-ADSP: Cross-Layer Adaptive Data Scheduling Policy in Mobile Ad-hoc Networks,” Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 97, pp. 530–563, 2019.
  39. 39.
    S. U. Shenoy, Udaya K. K. Shenoy, and M. S. Kumari, “Performance Analysis of Modified TCP New Reno for MANETs,” Recent Adv. Artif. Intell. Data Eng. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput., vol. 1386, Springer, Singapore, 2022.
  40. 40.
    N. O. Al-maaitah, “Tcp At-Er?: Tcp Adaptive Timeout Based-on Early Retransmission Over Manet,” vol. 97, no. 24, 2019.
  41. 41.
    H. K. Molia and A. D. Kothari, “TCP Variants for Mobile Adhoc Networks: Challenges and Solutions,” Wirel. Pers. Commun., vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 1791–1836, 2018.
  42. 42.
    Hardik K. Molia & Amit D. Kothari, “TCP-RLLD: TCP with reinforcement learning based loss differentiation for mobile adhoc networks,” Wirel. Networks,2023.
  43. 43.
    A. S. Deshpande and A. Kaushal, “Improving the performance of MANETs using the feedback based adaptive speedy TCP applied with adept route yielding algorithm,” Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res., vol. 12, no. 24, pp. 15699–15708, 2017.
  44. 44.
    D. Sunitha, A. Nagaraju, and G. Narsimha, “Cross-layer based routing protocol and solution to packet reordering for TCP in MANET,” Cluster Comput., vol. 22, pp. 10809–10816, 2019.
  45. 45.
    H. Huang, Z. Sun, and X. Wang, “End-to-end TCP congestion control for mobile applications,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 171628–171642, 2020.
  46. 46.
    S. K. Sah Tyagi, S. R. Pokhrel, M. Nemati, D. K. Jain, G. Li, and J. Choi, “Redesigning compound TCP with cognitive edge intelligence for WiFi-based IoT,” Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 125, pp. 859–868, 2021.
  47. 47.
    S. Parween and S. Z. Hussain, “Cross-Layer based TCP Performance Enhancement in IoT Networks,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 383–396, 2022.
  48. 48.
    C. Lim, “Improving congestion control of TCP for constrained IoT networks,” Sensors (Switzerland), vol. 20, no. 17, pp. 1–16, 2020.
  49. 49.
    M. Aljubayri, T. Peng, and M. Shikh-Bahaei, “Reduce delay of multipath TCP in IoT networks,” Wirel. Net., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 4189–4198, 2021.
  50. 50.
    Z. Dong, Y. Cao, N. Xiong, and P. Dong, “EE-MPTCP: An Energy-Efficient Multipath TCP Scheduler for IoT-Based Power Grid Monitoring Systems,” Electron., vol. 11, no. 19, pp. 1–18, 2022.
  51. 51.
    R. Ji, Y. Cao, X. Fan, Y. Jiang, G. Lei, and Y. Ma, “Multipath tcp-based iot communication evaluation: From the perspective of multipath management with machine learning,” Sensors (Switzerland), vol. 20, no. 22, pp. 1–14, 2020.
  52. 52.
    Y. Yang and L. Hanzo, “Permutation-Based TCP and UDP Transmissions to Improve Goodput and Latency in the Internet of Things,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 8, no. 18, pp. 14276–14286, 2021.
  53. 53.
    L. Zong, Y. Bai, C. Zhao, G. Luo, Z. Zhang, and H. Ma, “On Enhancing TCP to Deal with High Latency and Transmission Errors in Geostationary Satellite Network for 5G-IoT,” Secur. Commun. Networks, vol. 2020, 2020.
  54. 54.
    S. Lin and S. Jiang, “Learn-ing-Based On-AP TCP Performance Enhancement,” Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput., vol. 2020, 2020.
  55. 55.
    L. P. Verma and M. Kumar, “An IoT based Congestion Control Algorithm,” Internet of Things, vol. 9, p. 100157, 2020.
  56. 56.
    M. Park and J. Paek, “TAiM: TCP assistant-in-The-middle for multihop low-power and lossy networks in IoT,” J. Commun. Networks, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 192–199, 2019.
  57. 57.
    W. Sun, S. Yu, Y. Xing, and Z. Qin, “Parallel Transmission of Distributed Sensor Based on SCTP and TCP for Heterogeneous Wireless Networks in IoT,” Sensors, vol. 19, no. 9, 2019.
  58. 58.
    K. C. Leung, C. Lai, and H. Ding, “TCP-NCL: A serialized-timer approach for enhancing TCP over heterogeneous wired/wireless networks,” Comput. Commun., vol. 144, no. May, pp. 198–211, 2019.
  59. 59.
    C. Gomez, A. Arcia-Moret, and J. Crowcroft, “TCP in the Internet of Things: From Ostracism to Prominence,” IEEE Internet Comput., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 29–41, 2018.
  60. 60.
    R. M. Bhavadharini, S. Karthik, N. Karthikeyan, and A. Paul, “Wireless Networking Performance in IoT Using Adaptive Contention Window,” Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput., vol. 2018, 2018.
  61. 61.
    S. R. Pokhrel and C. Williamson, “Modeling Compound TCP over WiFi for IoT,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 864–878, 2018.
  62. 62.
    T. Toprasert and W. Lilakiataskun, “TCP congestion control with MDP algorithm for IoT over heterogeneous network,” 2017 17th Int. Symp. Commun. Inf. Technol. Isc. 2017, vol. 2018-January, pp. 1–5, 2017.
  63. 63.
    B. K. ?. B. Sercan Sari, Nurdan Canbaz, “Effect of TCP Variants on the Performance of 802.11 Networks for IoT,” 5th Int. Conf. Comput. Sci. Eng. (UBMK), IEEE, 2020.
  64. 64.
    W. Li, F. Zhou, W. Meleis, and K. Chowdhury, “Learning-based and data-driven TCP design for memory-constrained IoT,” Proc. - 12th Annu. Int. Conf. Distrib. Comput. Sens. Syst. DCOSS 2016, pp. 199–205, 2016.
  65. 65.
    R. Vanzara et al., “TCP-EXPO: Empirical approach to transport layer protocol for high-speed networks,” 2018 IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. Work. ICC Work. 2018 - Proc., pp. 1–6, 2018.
  66. 66.
    E. Gamess and B. Smith, “Performance evaluation of TCP and UDP over IPv4 and IPv6 for the ESP8266 Module,” ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser., pp. 161–169, 2020.
  67. 67.
    R. Abdul, S. Khan, P. Mohd, and N. Abdul, “EFFICIENCY OF SURVEILLANCE OF TCP PACKET IN IOT IN REDUCING THE RISK OF RANSOMWARE ATTACKS,” vol. 101, no. 3, 2023.
  68. 68.
    N. Cardwell, Y. Cheng, C. S. Gunn, S. H. Yeganeh, and V. Jacobson, “BBR: Congestion-Based Congestion Control,” Queue, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 20–53, 2016.
  69. 69.
    K. Sasaki, M. Hanai, K. Miyazawa, A. Kobayashi, N. Oda, and S. Yamaguchi, “TCP Fairness among Modern TCP Congestion Control Algorithms Including TCP BBR,” Proc. 2018 IEEE 7th Int. Conf. Cloud Networking, CloudNet 2018, pp. 0–3, 2018.
  70. 70.
    V. Cerf, V. Jacobson, N. Weaver, and J. Gettys, “BufferBloat: What’s Wrong with the Internet?” Queue, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 10–20, 2011.
  71. 71.
    J. Mo, R. J. La, V. Anantharam, and J. Walrand, “Analysis and comparison of TCP Reno and Vegas,” Proc. - IEEE INFOCOM, vol. 3, pp. 1556–1563, 1999.
  72. 72.
    G. Hasegawa, K. Kurata, and M. Murata, “Analysis and improvement of fairness between TCP Reno and Vegas for deployment of TCP Vegas to the Internet,” Int. Conf. Netw. Protoc., pp. 177–186, 2000.
  73. 73.
    R. Oura and S. Yamaguchi, “Fairness comparisons among modern TCP implementations,” Proc. - 26th IEEE Int. Conf. Adv. Inf. Netw. Appl. Work. WAINA 2012, no. 2, pp. 909–914, 2012.
  74. 74.
    R. Oura and S. Yamaguchi, “Fairness analysis among modern TCP congestion avoidance algorithms using actual TCP implementation and actual network equipments,” Proc. - 2011 2nd Int. Conf. Netw. Comput. ICNC 2011, pp. 297–299, 2011.
  75. 75.
    M. Hock, R. Bless, and M. Zitterbart, “Experimental evaluation of BBR congestion control,” Proc. - Int. Conf. Netw. Protoc. ICNP, vol. 2017-October, no. January 2018, 2017.
  76. 76.
    F. Li, J. W. Chung, X. Jiang, and M. Claypool, “TCP CUBIC versus BBR on the Highway,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 10771 LNCS, pp. 269–280, 2018.
  77. 77.
    Y. Akiyama, T. Kozu, and S. Yamaguchi, “Active packet dropping for improving performance fairness among modern TCPs,” APNOMS 2014 - 16th Asia-Pacific Netw. Oper. Manag. Symp., 2014.
  78. 78.
    M. Hanai, S. Yamaguchi, and A. Kobayashi, “Modified Controlling Queue Delay for TCP fairness improvement,” 18th Asia-Pacific Netw. Oper. Manag. Symp. APNOMS 2016 Manag. Softwarized Infrastruct. - Proc., 2016.
  79. 79.
    S. Z. Hussain and S. Parween, “Analysis of TCP Issues and Their Possible Solutions in the Internet of Things,” Int. Arab J. Inf. Technol., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 206–214, 2023.
  80. 80.
    Hussain S. and Parween S., “Comparative Study of TCP Congestion Control Algorithm in IoT,” in Proceeding of 3rd International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking, Greater Noida, pp. 1428-1431, 2022.
  81. 81.
    Allman M., Paxson V., and Blanton E., “TCP Congestion Control,” Internet Eng. Task Force RFC 5681, 2009. Available online: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5681.
  82. 82.
    Floyd S, Henderson T, and Gurtov A. “The NewReno modification to TCP's fast recovery algorithm.” No. rfc3782. 2004. Available online: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3782.
  83. 83.
    Brakmo L. and Peterson L., “TCP Vegas: End-to-End Congestion Avoidance on A Global Internet,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 13, no. 8, 1465-14, 1995.
  84. 84.
    Mascolo S., Gerla M., Sanadidi M., Casetti C., and Wang R., “TCP Westwood: End-to-end Bandwidth Estimation for Efficient Transport over Wired and Wireless Networks,” Wireless Networks, vol. 8, no. 5091294, pp. 467-479, 2002.
  85. 85.
    Jacobson V., “Compressing TCP/IP Headers for Low-Speed Serial Links,” No. rfc1144, 1990.
  86. 86.
    Cheng Y., Chu J., Radhakrishnan S., and Jain A., “Tcp Fast Open,” RFC 7413, pp. 1–26, 2014.
  87. 87.
    Widmer, J. and Handley, M., TCP-friendly multicast congestion control (TFMCC): Protocol specification. No. rfc4654. 2006.
  88. 88.
    Zhu, Li, Nirwan Ansari, Zafer Sahinoglu, Anthony Vetro, and Huifang Sun. "Scalable layered multicast with explicit congestion notification." In Proceedings ITCC 2003. International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing, pp. 331-335. IEEE, 2003.
  89. 89.
    Montenegro G., Grossman D., Touch J., Mahdavi J., Bormann C., Karn P., Reiner L., Fairhurst G., and Wood L., “Advice for Internet Subnetwork Designers,” No. rfc3819, 2004.
  90. 90.
    Parween S. and Hussain S., “A Comparative Analysis of Coap Based Congestion Control in IoT,” in Proceeding of 4th International Conference on Recent Trends in Computer Science and Technology, Jamshedpur, pp. 321-324, 2021.
  91. 91.
    Betzler A., Gomez C., Demirkol L., and Paradells J., “Coap Congestion Control for the Internet of Things,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 154-160, 2016.
  92. 92.
    Betzler A., Gomez C., Demirkol L., and Paradells “Cocoa+: An Advanced Congestion Control Mechanism for Coap,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 33, pp. 126-139, 2015.
  93. 93.
    Rathod V., Jeppu N., Sastry S., Singala S., and Tahiliani M., “Cocoa++: Delay Gradient Based Congestion Control for Internet of Things,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 100, pp. 1053-1072, 2019.
  94. 94.
    Akpakwu G., Hancke G., and Abu-Mahfouz A., “CACC: Context-aware Congestion Control Approach for Lightweight Coap/UDP-Based Internet of Things Traffic,” Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 1-19, 2020.
  95. 95.
    Ouakasse F. and Rakrak S., “An Improved Adaptive Coap Congestion Control Algorithm,” Int. J. of Online and Biomed. Engineer., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 96-109, 2019.
  96. 96.
    Jarvinen I., Raitahila L., Cao Z., and Kojo M., “FASOR Retransmission Timeout and Congestion Control Mechanism for CoAP,” IEEE Global Communications Conference, Abu Dhabi, pp. 1-7, 2018.
  97. 97.
    Kuzmanovic, A. and Knightly, E.W., "TCP-LP: low-priority service via end-point congestion control." IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 14, no. 4 (2006): 739-752.
  98. 98.
    Clausen, Thomas, and Philippe Jacquet, eds. "RFC3626: Optimized link state routing protocol (OLSR)." 2003.
  99. 99.
    Perkins, Charles, Elizabeth Belding-Royer, and Samir Das. "RFC3561: Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing." 2003.
  100. 100.
    Chockalingam, A., Michele Zorzi, and Velio Tralli. "Wireless TCP performance with link layer FEC/ARQ." In 1999 IEEE International Conference on Communications (Cat. No. 99CH36311), vol. 2, pp. 1212-1216. IEEE, 1999.
  101. 101.
    Liu, Qingwen, Shengli Zhou, and Georgios B. Giannakis. "TCP performance in wireless access with adaptive modulation and coding." In 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37577), vol. 7, pp. 3989-3993. IEEE, 2004.
  102. 102.
    Seguí, John, and Esther Jennings. "Delay tolerant networking-bundle protocol simulation." In 2nd IEEE International Conference on Space Mission Challenges for Information Technology (SMC-IT'06), pp. 6-pp. IEEE, 2006.
  103. 103.
    Ramani, Rohit, and Abhay Karandikar. "Explicit congestion notification (ECN) in TCP over wireless network." In 2000 IEEE International Conference on Personal Wireless Communications. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No. 00TH8488), pp. 495-499. IEEE, 2000.
  104. 104.
    Floyd S., Mahdavi J., Mathis M., and Romanow A., “TCP Selective Acknowledgment Options,” No. rfc2018, 1996.
  105. 105.
    Ha S, Rhee I, Xu L, CUBIC: a new TCP-friendly high-speed TCP variant. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 42:64–74, 2008.
  106. 106.
    Perez-Costa, Xavier, and Daniel Camps-Mur. "IEEE 802.11 E QoS and power saving features overview and analysis of combined performance [Accepted from Open Call]." IEEE Wireless Communications 17, no. 4 (2010): 88-96.
  107. 107.
    Cerri, Davide, and Alessandro Ghioni. "Securing AODV: The A-SAODV secure routing prototype." IEEE Communications Magazine 46, no. 2 (2008): 120-125.
  108. 108.
    Hu, Yih-Chun, David B. Johnson, and Adrian Perrig. "Secure Efficient Ad hoc Distance vector routing." In the Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and applications (WMCSA’02). 2002.
  109. 109.
    Verwoerd, Theuns, and Ray Hunt. "Intrusion detection techniques and approaches." Computer Communications 25, no. 15 (2002): 1356-1365.
  110. 110.
    Mathis M. and Mahdavi J., “Forward Acknowledgement: Refining TCP Congestion Control,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 281-29, 1996.
  111. 111.
    Alabaedy, Raaid N. "Enhancing TCP Performance in Mobile Ad Hoc Network Using Explicit Link Failure Notification (ELFN)." Ph.D. diss., Universiti Utara Malaysia, 2012.
  112. 112.
    Johnson, David, Yin-chun Hu, and David Maltz. The dynamic source routing protocol (DSR) for mobile ad hoc networks for IPv4. No. rfc4728. 2007.
SCOPUS
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Announcements

Archives

Downloads

Contact Us

Dr.M. Milton Joe
EverScience Publications,
Nagercoil, Tamilnadu,India

Talk to Us

+91 9442777224

Email Us

editor@ijcna.org

info@ijcna.org

info@everscience.org

Quick Links

Follow Us

Copyright © 2023; EverScience Publications

Designed & Maintained By Shiro Software Solutions