1.
Al-Fuqaha, M. Guizani, M. Mohammadi, M. Aledhari, and M. Ayyash, “Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2347–2376, 2015, doi: 10.1109/comst.2015.2444095.
2.
Qiu, Tie, Zhao Zhao, Tong Zhang, Chen Chen, and CL Philip Chen. "Underwater Internet of Things in smart ocean: System architecture and open issues." IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, Vol. 16, No. 7, pp. 4297-4307, 2019
3.
W. Kim, H. W. Moon, and Y. J. Yoon, “Adaptive Triangular Deployment of Underwater Wireless Acoustic Sensor Network considering the Underwater Environment,” Journal of Sensors, vol. 2019, pp. 1–11, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1155/2019/6941907.
4.
C.-C. Kao, Y.-S. Lin, G.-D. Wu, and C.-J. Huang, “A Comprehensive Study on the Internet of Underwater Things: Applications, Challenges, and Channel Models,” Sensors, vol. 17, no. 7, p. 1477, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.3390/s17071477
5.
“RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks,” datatracker.ietf.org. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/id/draft-ietf-roll-rpl-13.html (accessed Sep. 21, 2022).
6.
Harith Kharrufa, H. A. A. Al-Kashoash and A.H. Kemp, "RPL-based routing protocols in IoT applications: A Review", IEEE Sensors Journal, Vol. 19, No. 15, pp. 5952 - 5967, 2019.
7.
Lamaazi, Hanane, and Nabil Benamar. "A comprehensive survey on enhancements and limitations of the RPL protocol: A focus on the objective function." Ad Hoc Networks, Vol. 96, pp. 102001, 2020.
8.
S. Jiang, “On Reliable Data Transfer in Underwater Acoustic Networks: A Survey From Networking Perspective,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1036–1055, 2018, doi: 10.1109/comst.2018.2793964.
9.
Z. Zhou, B. Yao, R. Xing, L. Shu, and S. Bu, “E-CARP: An Energy Efficient Routing Protocol for UWSNs in the Internet of Underwater Things,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 4072–4082, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1109/jsen.2015.2437904.
10.
Darabkh, Khalid A., and Muna Al-Akhras. "RPL over Internet of Things: Challenges, Solutions, and Recommendations." IEEE International Conference on Mobile Networks and Wireless Communications (ICMNWC), pp. 1-7, 2021.
11.
R. Diamant, P. Casari, F. Campagnaro, O. Kebkal, V. Kebkal, and M. Zorzi, “Fair and Throughput-Optimal Routing in Multimodal Underwater Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1738–1754, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1109/twc.2017.2785223.
12.
Y. Su, R. Fan, X. Fu, and Z. Jin, “DQELR: An Adaptive Deep Q-Network-Based Energy- and Latency-Aware Routing Protocol Design for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 9091–9104, 2019, doi: 10.1109/access.2019.2891590.
13.
S. Cai, Z. Gao, D. Yang, and N. Yao, “A network coding based protocol for reliable data transfer in underwater acoustic sensor,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1603–1609, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2013.02.001.
14.
Pancaroglu, Doruk, and Sevil Sen. "Load balancing for RPL-based Internet of Things: A review." Ad Hoc Networks, Vol. 116, pp. 102491, 2021
15.
Lamaazi, H., El Ahmadi, A., Benamar, N., &Jara, A. J. “Of-ecf: A new optimization of the objective function for parent selection in RPL” IEEE international conference on wireless and mobile computing, networking and communications (WiMob), pp.27–32, 2019.
16.
Kechiche, I., Bousnina, I., &Samet, A. “A novel opportunistic fuzzy logic based objective function for the routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks”,15th international wireless communications & mobile computing conference (IWCMC), pp.698–703, 2019
17.
Mishra, S. N., Elappila, M., & Chinara, S. Eha-rpl: A composite routing technique in IoT application networks. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol.1045, pp.645–657, 2020
18.
Al-Kashoash, H. “Congestion-aware routing protocol for 6LoWPANs”. In Sensor networks: Toward the internet of things, pp. 95–107, 2020
19.
Eloudrhiri Hassani, Abdelhadi, Aicha Sahel, and Abdelmajid Badri. "IRH-OF: A New Objective Function for RPL Routing Protocol in IoT Applications." Wireless Personal Communications, Vol. 119, No. 1, pp. 673-689, 2021
20.
Liou, En-Cheng, Chien-Chi Kao, Ching-Hao Chang, Yi-Shan Lin, and Chun-Ju Huang. "Internet of underwater things: Challenges and routing protocols." IEEE international conference on applied system invention (ICASI), pp. 1171-1174, 2018.
21.
Coutinho, Rodolfo WL, Azzedine Boukerche, and Antonio AF Loureiro. "A novel opportunistic power controlled routing protocol for internet of underwater things." Computer Communications, Vol.150, pp. 72-82, 2020.
22.
Al-Bzoor, Manal, Ahmed Musa, Khawla Alzoubi, and Taha Gharaibeh. "A Directional Selective Power Routing Protocol for the Internet of Underwater Things." Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022.
23.
Lee, Sungwon, Yonghwan Jeong, Eunbae Moon, and Dongkyun Kim. "An efficient MOP decision method using hop interval for RPL-based underwater sensor networks." Wireless Personal Communications, Vol. 93, No. 4, pp.1027-1041, 2017.
24.
Z. Zhou, B. Yao, R. Xing, L. Shu, and S. Bu, “E-CARP: An Energy Efficient Routing Protocol for UWSNs in the Internet of Underwater Things,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 4072–4082, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1109/jsen.2015.2437904.
25.
C. Petrioli, R. Petroccia, J. R. Potter, and D. Spaccini, “The SUNSET framework for simulation, emulation and at-sea testing of underwater wireless sensor networks,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 34, pp. 224–238, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2014.08.012.
26.
S. Karim, F. K. Shaikh, and B. S. Chowdhry, “Simulation-based quantitative analysis of efficient data transfer routing protocols for Internet of Underwater Things,” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 121, p. 102645, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.simpat.2022.102645.